Twitter Updates
- +1 RT @nickbilton: Holy... Greatest. Fish tank. Ever. i.imgur.com/8k35N.jpg 10 hours ago
- Post-pyruvate, a carbon compound isomer is Kardashian klipped in a series of steps to fund my organization. THAT's an acronym. For what? #fb 1 day ago
- Of course I showed this video while talking about metabolism today... bit.ly/d9cCuX #fb 1 day ago
- Tell me you've seen the LOAF pistachio commercial @fishsports... 2 days ago
- 100 times yes RT @pourmecoffee: Stop trying so hard TBS. Men At Work isn't going to happen. 2 days ago
-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
Categories
- Accommodation (18)
- Apologetics (1)
- Atheism (10)
- Biblical interpretation (11)
- Biology and Ideology (1)
- Book review (4)
- consciousness (12)
- Cross (2)
- Determinism (1)
- Dilbert (2)
- Education and mentoring (5)
- Environmental Ethics (1)
- Evangelicalism (13)
- Evolution (53)
- Evolution of Adam (5)
- Free will (1)
- Get Fuzzy (3)
- Guest post (4)
- Hawking (1)
- Human nature (26)
- Humor (25)
- Ian Barbour (7)
- Illuminating quote of the week (4)
- Image of God (17)
- Immanence (1)
- John Polkinghorne (11)
- Karl Giberson (4)
- Materialism (11)
- Methods of science (8)
- Mind (6)
- Miracles (3)
- Morality (7)
- National Academy of Sciences (1)
- Panentheism (2)
- Persona (1)
- Pete Enns (5)
- PHD Comics (2)
- Philosophy (4)
- Philosophy of science (10)
- Politics (1)
- reason (8)
- Reductionism (19)
- Roundup (24)
- Sam Harris (4)
- Saving Darwin (3)
- Science (13)
- science vs. religion (53)
- Scientist-Theologians (26)
- Scientists (7)
- soul (2)
- Subjectivity (9)
- Supernatural vs. Natural (7)
- TED talks (8)
- theology (5)
- tradition (1)
- Transcendence (1)
- Transhumanism (1)
- Uncategorized (36)
- Welcome (1)
- Wesley quadrilateral (1)
- xkcd (11)
Category Cloud
Accommodation Atheism Biblical interpretation consciousness Education and mentoring Evangelicalism Evolution Human nature Humor Ian Barbour Image of God John Polkinghorne Materialism Methods of science Mind Morality Philosophy of science reason Reductionism Roundup Science science vs. religion Scientist-Theologians Scientists Subjectivity Supernatural vs. Natural TED talks theology Uncategorized xkcd-
Top Clicks
Blogroll
- 13.7 NPR Cosmos & Culture
- A biologist\’s view of science
- A View from an Evolutionary Creationist
- An Evangelical Dialogue on Evolution
- Clayton's Emergings
- Creation of an Evolutionist
- Epiphenom: Science of Religion & Non-Belief
- Euangelion
- Experimental Theology (Richard Beck)
- Exploring our Matrix (James F McGrath)
- For the Love of Wisdom (Thomas Jay Oord)
- Intersection
- Irtiqa Science & Religion
- Jesus Creed (Scot McKnight)
- Like a Child
- Michael Shermer
- Neurophilosophy
- Not Exactly Rocket Science (Ed Yong)
- Panda's Thumb
- Quintessence of Dust
- Rachel Held Evans
- Religion and Science (Huff Post)
- Replicated Typo
- Science & Religion: A View from an Evolutionary Creationist/Theistic Evolutionist
- Science and the Sacred
- Storied Theology (JR Daniel Kirk)
- The Intersection
- The Loom
- Thoughtful Animal
- Undeception
- Why Evolution Is True
- Wired Science Blogs
I can be found...
Institutes, Groups, Organizations
- American Scientific Affiliation
- ASU Transhumanism
- Big Questions Online
- BioLogos
- Center for Theology & Natural Sciences
- Counterbalance
- Edge
- Faraday Institute for Science & Religion
- h+ Magazine
- Ian Ramsey Centre for Science & Religion
- Institute on Religion in an Age of Science
- John Templeton Foundation
- Metanexus Institute
- Patheos
- Point of Inquiry
- Project Reason
- Richard Dawkins Foundation
- Science & Religion Today
- Seed Magazine
- Skeptic
- Society for the Scientific Study of Religion
- The Science Network
- Veritas Forum
- Zygon Center for Religion & Science
Journals
-
Blog Stats
- 32,668 hits
Category Archives: Ian Barbour
A rough draft of videos illustrating science and religion models. Got others?
Tomorrow night we are going over models for the interaction of science and religion, using Barbour’s conflict, independence, dialogue, and integration models. I’ll probably also mention a few different typologies that have been put forth by others, but we’ll focus … Continue reading →
Integration: it’s not just calculus and social science
We’ve been looking at Ian Barbour’s 4 models for the interaction of science and religion and will finish today by exploring the 4th and final model, integration. To help put some traction behind these models, we’ve used everyone’s favorite issue … Continue reading →
The dialogue model of science and religion
di·a·logue [dahy-uh-lawg] –noun 1. conversation between two or more persons. 2. the conversation between characters in a novel, drama, etc. 3. an exchange of ideas or opinions on a particular issue, especially a political or religious issue, with a view … Continue reading →
One hack’s attempt at a syllabus for an undergrad course in science and religion
The week after next my first course in science and religion will begin. It’s a survey/topics-type course that is for 2 credits and is meeting on Wednesday nights for 3+ hours, which constrains the course design a bit but provides … Continue reading →
The independence model of science and religion… the “enlightened” response to warfare
We’re looking at Ian Barbour’s 4 model typology for the interaction of science and religion and are using creation and evolution as our canvas. In our last post, we talked about the model of conflict, in which creation and evolution … Continue reading →
Applying Barbour’s models to creation and evolution
At the end of this month I will be starting my first introductory course on science and religion. In addition to various essays, the primary text that we will be reading and discussing is Ian Barbour’s When Science Meets Religion, … Continue reading →
Science and Religion: Barbour’s 4 models
In my last post , I linked to an article by Michael Fuller in which he provided an introduction to science and theology and Ian Barbour’s 4 models for the interaction between science and religion. In this post, I’d like … Continue reading →